Army vehicle electronics networking is complex and challenging due to vendor-specific devices and interfaces. Military vehicles require 100% network uptime and security. The network must reduce vehicle clutter, focus on saving soldiers’ lives, and provide minimum latency. Battle requirements change frequently, and vehicle electronics are added ad-hoc to the existing network. This work introduces an open-standard architecture approach that offers non-proprietary solutions with good interoperability, security, scalability, performance benefits, and cost savings.
As an architecture development use case, this work assumes the following core electronic devices: four sensors, four display devices, and one weapon station. Network architecture development for these devices involves requirements, communication protocols, network topology, and bandwidth.
A communication protocol in a network allows inter-device interactions. Unique interfaces in Army vehicle electronics complicate network scalability and performance. A common bus is recommended for a network to allow all devices to communicate in a standard, single interface. The Gigabit (GB) Ethernet, CAN bus, USB 2.0, and IEEE 1394 protocols are the open-standard candidates for a common bus network communication protocol. Each of the protocols was evaluated. In the evaluation and selection process, for each protocol, and for each factor, a ranking was assigned. Each protocol’s rankings were added and the highest-ranked protocol was selected.
The GB Ethernet data rate is at Gb/s (supports 1-100 Gb/s), the IEEE 1394 is at 49 Mb/s, the USB is at 480 Mb/s, and the CAN is at 1Mb/s. Due to low data transmission rate, the CAN is not a good video bus, but IEEE 1394 is good for video. The USB 2.0 data rate is very low compared to GB Ethernet. In summary, the GB Ethernet had good data transmission rate and minimum technical risk. It is scalable and commercial networking hardware is available.
In general, electronics need to process video, image, and other mission-critical data. The network must satisfy each data type’s bandwidth requirements. To support a continuous 3 Gb/s and a frequent 0.37 Gb/s data transfer rate to reduce re-acquisition cost for future expansion/scalability, the 10-Gb network bandwidth and the network devices to support it were recommended.
A star network topology offers greater advantages over ring, mesh, tree, and bus. The star network is scalable and has minimal performance or operational impacts. Star networks are tolerant to single device failures. Request messages do not pass through multiple devices before reaching the target. Each device is isolated by a link that connects it to the central hub. Multiple cable types can be used within a network. Based on this evaluation, multiple star networks were recommended for device connections. Every device goes through either a router or a switch. Each device has at least two network paths to reach other devices (redundancy).
Army vehicles operate in different terrains. The electronics on the vehicle continuously monitor and feed mission-critical information to the crew. Each vehicle will have electronic devices and weapons to carry out missions. For effective operation of these devices, a solid, fault-tolerant network is needed. In the recommended architecture, the sensors continuously, or on demand, capture data. The data is displayed, processed, distributed, and stored. The captured data enables crewmembers to take actions and eliminate enemy forces using onboard weapons.
Subscribe today to receive the INSIDER, a FREE e-mail newsletter from Defense Tech Briefs featuring exclusive previews of upcoming articles, late breaking NASA and industry news, hot products and design ideas, links to online resources, and much more.